The World According to Monsanto is a documentary that dissects the evil that is Monsanto. Evil is a very strong word, but I don’t know a better one. Watch for yourself and judge if I’ve been too harsh. It makes for fascinating, if grim, viewing, and is available to watch free on the web. Be warned – it will most likely make you feel angry and radical.
A recent editorial in the New Zealand Herald (4 June 2008 ) offers the Green Party some advice on political positioning:
Despite their durability, the Greens should be a stronger party in this country. Environmental values are widely held and can offer a political identity outside the normal social divide. The party in our Parliament, however, has not offered a separate identity, it adheres to a left-wing view of environmentalism, opposed to free trade, preferring public ownership to private property, distracted by issues it calls social justice.
A broader Green Party would build some conservation projects on private property rights and recognise the power of market forces to ensure resources are used sustainably. A party of that stamp would draw support from across the spectrum and could contemplate dealings with any government.
The Green Party needs to move out of left field and become a central player.
It’s not first time I’ve seen this complaint in the Herald (here’s another example). But one might easily be led to suspect the Herald’s motives in freely offering its counsel to the Greens, given the newspaper’s tendency toward unreconstructed neoliberalism (which might just explain the emphasis on private property rights and market forces, and the dismissal of social justice concerns in the above quote).
However, the frequency with which I have heard similar complaints from environmentalists, conservationists and even, at times, some party members suggests that it is not just editorial writers who have failed to grasp something quite fundamental about ecopolitics.
A recent study of environmentally sceptical books gives a fascinating glimpse behind the wall of denial that has been constructed in these publications. Peter Jacques, Riley Dunlap and Mark Freeman, the authors of the study, characterise this environmental scepticism as:
– the denial of the significance and even the authenticity of environmental problems
– the questioning of environmentally protective policies and a promotion of anti-regulatory policies
– the suggestion that environmental protection threatens western ‘progress’.
Compiled on the basis of these criteria, the “sceptics’ reading list” comprises 141 books published in English and appearing between 1972 and 2005.